On Conservatism

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

The little blurb on the right-hand side of this site states, “My politics are conservative, but I am an independent.” I documented leaving the Republican Party in 2007.

In that post I stated:

Today, I became independent once again. That does not mean I have moved off any of my positions. Rather, it is affirmation that no party does a good enough job of representing my positions. I am conservative and neither the Democrats or the Republicans are equally conservative.

Interestingly, there is still no party that represents my positions.

There is little that I can point to with Democrats that I agree with. The approach, the issues, etc. are nowhere near where I am. It feels as though every move is to interject government into my life. I favor instead, for government to leave my life.

One would think the Republican Party would be a better fit. Yet, for six years during the Bush Administration, Congress was Republican-led. What did this one-party rule net us? Spending and corruption ad nauseum. Yes, I agreed with the war, but that was not the only issue during those years. Last year, before he left office, President Bush placed government squarely in the middle of financial markets in a manner that made it easy for an incoming President Obama to pass unprecedented spending.

Last evening Virginia and New Jersey elected Republican governors. Listening to Republicans, one keeps hearing about the Republican revolution, a la 1993 when Newt Gingrich ushered in the Contract With America. I voted for Gingrich for POTUS last year. I would not do so at this point.

As the insidious media-spectacle in upstate has demonstrated, the Republican Party is still a mess. Internally, the old GOP (Gingrich et al.) are battling the “conservatives” (Palin, Malkin et al.) for control of the party. It’s a fight I suppose that needs to occur, but it’s going to be messy and in the end, I suspect the Republican Party will be weaker.

While I am admittedly more conservative than the average bear, putting a party in the hands of the fringe is going to be problematic. Palin is nice as a rogue, but she is not a leader. Malkin is great for focusing on issues, but she should not be guiding the debate.

Like it or not, these “conservatives” are equal to the Move On-Soros crowd on the left. It is easy to marginalize the left by demonizing the groups at the fringe. Shoot, locally that is what is occurring. Associate with Millville First or Track Racket, anonymous hatred will be hurled one’s way. So much will said, the message, no matter how accurate it may be, is lost because regular folks don’t want to sift through the sludge.

I suspect that is what happened with Freeholder Lou Magazzu. Magazzu is the poster boy of what is wrong with New Jersey politics, yet he was the top vote-getter last evening in the freeholder race. Why?

Magazzu Watch is a site that popped up to highlight Magazzu’s flaws or as they state it:

We just wanted to share our concerns about all we felt was wrong with Lou’s county government.

There’s a lot of good stuff at the site. Yet every post is accompanied by inane commentary, most of it anonymous. Those who run the site claim there would be retribution from Magazzu if their names were revealed. Yet when one cowers behind pseudonyms, not only is civility lost, so is accountability. In recent weeks Magazzu Watch has stumbled with its reporting and has been rightly called on it. Furthermore, there is an incident where a contributor revealed personally-identifiable information about one of these anonymous posters. He claimed he was not acting on behalf of the web site, but the web site, as far as anyone can tell, has done nothing to rectify the action. It’s wrong.

Nevertheless, it just goes to show that as soon as organization occurs, the straw man attack is underway. It’s easy to discount Magazzu criticism when it comes through Magazzu Watch as the site is little more than The Daily Journal comment section hosted elsewhere.

I don’t where this leaves me. My views are not represented by (m)any I want to associate with. Even when the state ousts an inept governor, it approves to put taxpayers in further debt, and it continues to elect the local politicians who cause the spending problems to continue.

One of the words I am currently teaching my students is insignificant. It is difficult to help but think as a conservative in Cumberland County, NJ that I am insignificant. The machine is stacked against a single person making a difference. As soon as he organizes, the anonymous cowards begin hurling dung at the fan obfuscating the discourse.

I am sure this is just post-election blues.  Sigh . . .

McCain’s Move

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

I’ll grant that my initial reaction to McCain’s move was WTF? followed closely by This may be a very good political move. Then it dawned on me that while it garners all the attention now and shines an interesting, if not positive, light on McCain, it only works in the end if his work in D.C. is productive.

And what is McCain going to do while in D.C.?  Lobby hard for spending $700 billion of taxpayer money to bail out private businesses.

I have favorable opinions of Goldman Sachs.  In addition to ousting Jon Corzine as its CEO a decade ago, my BIL works for the company.  Goldman today announced $5 billion of funds coming in from none other than Warren “I Should Pay More Taxes” Buffet.  It is also going to sell $5 billion of common stock.  Together that $10 billion is expected to help out Goldman.  Not a penny of my money is used.

The politics McCain is using is going to cost me dearly.  I know, I am always pessimistic.  I’ll still vote for Newt.  Newt supports Kill the Bailout.

eCache Endorsement

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

I’ve been pondering the election booth of late.  I am on record that neither Barack Obama or John McCain meet my standards for President of the United States.  The addition of Joe Biden and Sarah Palin to the tickets has not changed that opinion.

I’ve been challenged as to how I will vote based on that.  Some suggest that my opinion is nullified because of this.  I reject that.  Just because I dismiss the two major parties’ nominees does not mean I have forfeited my opinion.  And just because I refuse to vote for either of the likely men to be elected, also does not mean that I forfeit anything.

Yet, I will be in the voting booth and I will be faced with voting for someone.  I considered Bob Barr.  He is the former Republican who is running as the Libertarian candidate.  Eh . . . I have some Libertarian tendencies, but Barr has never impressed me.  He is one of the faces of Clinton’s impeachment.

I half-toyed with the idea of writing myself in.  But the fact of the matter is that I am not fit to be POTUS.  I would be too far over my head.  That, I decided, would be a wasted vote.  I thought of writing in Fred Thompson, who I initially supported.  But Fred, as much as I like his views, doesn’t truly seem prepared to lead our country; he was barely prepared to run his own campaign.

So the question then is Who is the best candidate to be POTUS?  After careful consideration I have concluded that Newt Gingrich is the person best suited to lead our country.

Make no mistake, I have some issues with the former Speaker of the House.  The womanizing and the shady book deals aside, his politics are right and he has demonstrated leadership since he left public office.  He did not become a lobbyist as so many others have.

Gingrich has foreign policy experience, legislative experience, and is currently heading an organization that is spearheading not only community action, but sparking conversations on improving our country.  That is leadership.

Gingrich is correct on the big issues: immigration, war, taxes, abortion, etc.

It’s true, writing in Gingrich’s name on 4 November most likely is not going to make him president.  The beauty of this country is that everyone is entitled to pull the lever (push the button) once per election.  I will do so proudly for Newt Ginrich. 

Newt Will Not Run

Saturday, September 29th, 2007

Newt Gingrich will not run for president.  It was unlikely that he would have, but he had been teasing the public recently with a promise of running if he were able to raise $30 million in a quarter.

The official reason that he will provide this afternoon is that he has learned that he is unable to explore a run and remain chairman of American Solutions.

While Gingrich has political baggage that would dog him during a race, the American people are worse off today.  Gingrich is a political heavyweight.  He is a thinker.  He is a statesman.  I do not see a man or woman of his caliber in the race.

Where’s Fred?

Sunday, September 23rd, 2007

Well, I was excited that Fred Thompson decided to run for president. He declared on 5 September on Leno while all the other conservative Republican candidates “debated” in New Hampshire.

Somehow, I thought I might have heard of Thompson making news during the intervening 18 days. He received more press when he was just a citizen.

Why isn’t Fred making the rounds on cable news? Heck, I am more interested in hearing Newt speak right now.